Phase I
  Phase I
You Are Using IPv4 To Access This Site
Your IP Address is: 38.103.63.61

From: Kohn Rodolfo-ARK025 (rodolfo.kohn@motorola.com)
Date: 01/13/05



moonv6 post from Kohn Rodolfo-ARK025 <rodolfo.kohn@motorola.com> Ed,
I've configured uClinux to use 1MB RAM in the evaluation board. In the future I plan to make it work with less memory. I'm going to generate the .map file and send it to you. Regarding the interrupt latency, unfortunately I haven't taken any measurement about it but I could do it. If you need that information, please just tell me and I'll do it. Regarding the Vocera Communications Badge, it is an example of a very interesting and innovative mobile product and I mention the advantages a product like this would have if it used MIPv6 (point 15.3). I'm very interested in knowing more about Treck's Mobile IPv6 stack (I've already read http://www.treck.com/PDF/Mobile_IPv6.pdf), I suppose it is related to the Voyager Mobile IPv6 stack announced by Elmic on June 2003, right? In my work, in page 38, there's a link to the Treck's web site, as an example of a Mobile IPv6 stack for embedded systems and RTOS. Do you have MIPv6 implementations for routers and mobile agents?

Thanks,
Rodolfo Kohn.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Remmell [mailto:eremmell@treck.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:04 PM
> To: 'Bound, Jim'; nav6tf@ipv6forum.com; moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu
> Cc: Kohn Rodolfo-ARK025
> Subject: RE: [>>> SPAM <<<] - [moonv6] Good MIPv6 Deployment
> Analysis via Masters Thesis - Email found in subject
>
>
> I'm curious what his RAM and ROM usage were on the Coldfire
> target to implement this functionality (when I looked at the
> IPv4 version of uCLinux, it was an order of magnitude larger
> than our IPv4 stack) - a .map file generated by the linker
> would be very interesting to see. Also, I'm curious if he
> made any measurement of interrupt latency, which for Linux is
> usually pretty big (i.e. Linux is not capable of hard real-time).
>
> BTW, the Voicera Communications Badge he refers to runs our
> IPv4 stack (www.treck.com). This product didn't have any
> mobile IP, although we do provide both Mobile IPv4 and Mobile
> IPv6 for MN.
>
> Thanks.
> - Ed Remmell
>
> Treck, Inc. (formerly Elmic Systems, USA)
>
> Best of Show Winner, ESC 2003
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu
> > [mailto:owner-moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu] On Behalf Of Bound, Jim
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:30 PM
> > To: nav6tf@ipv6forum.com; moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu
> > Cc: Kohn Rodolfo-ARK025
> > Subject: [>>> SPAM <<<] - [moonv6] Good MIPv6 Deployment
> > Analysis via Masters Thesis - Email found in subject
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > The attached is a good paper on MIPv6 implementation analysis
> > from Rodolfo Kohn. Very hands on stuff.
> >
> > /jim
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date:
> 1/12/2005
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 1/12/2005
>
>
>
> ---
> Treck, Inc. - Confidentiality Notice
>
> This electronic transmission may contain information that is
> proprietary or confidential. You are hereby notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
> electronic transmission to some other entity, without the
> expressed written consent of Treck, Inc. is strictly
> prohibited, unless the contents of this electronic
> transmission specifically authorizes you to do so. If your
> receipt of this electronic transmission is in error, please
> notify the corporate offices of Treck, Inc. immediately by
> calling (513) 528-5732, or by reply to this transmission.
>
>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 12/01/06 EST