Your IP Address is: 38.103.63.61
[moonv6] NAv6TF Presentation today at Potomac Forum and PR Interview per 25 billion
From: Bound, Jim (Jim.Bound@hp.com)
Date: 02/07/06
- Next message: Bound, Jim: "[moonv6] U.S. Senate FCC Network Neutrality - Vint Testimony"
- Previous message: Vodinh, Hai: "RE: [moonv6] RE: [nav6tf] RTI Article on IPv6 Cost and Deployment"
Folks,
Attached are the slides I will use today in D.C. at the Willard Hotel for IPv6 Transition Guidance Briefs sponsored by the Potomac Forum.
<<NAv6TF_IPv6_Transition_Best_Industry_Practices_20060202.pdf>>
Also thanks to Joya Subudhi I will being doing press interview this Thursday or Friday with influential news paper regarding the RTI press and the 25 billion as CTO IPv6 Forum and Chair NAv6TF. I will take all input provided and reflect the views here and Vint's initial concern. Joya and I will not reveal the newspaper until after it is over.
Also see below some non NAv6TF input that is anonymous.
Not to cast doubt or aspersions upon the economic estimates in this report, but from the second page of the report itself comes the following:
"As a part of this report by RTI International, NIST requested estimates
of transition and other costs associated with the Internet Protocol. The
quantitative information contained in the RTI report is based on an
extremely limited number of participants, including interested
stakeholders. Further, because of the early phase of transition to the
new Protocol, all estimates obtained are preliminary in nature and
subject to significant revision. The results presented, therefore, are
not to be regarded as statistically significant, but rather as rough
indications of how industry and government costs may unfold
underdifferent transition strategies. Thus, the quantitative information
contained in this report is meant to be used only as an illustration,
not as a definitive assessment."
and
"The estimates provided in this document were largely based on
stakeholder interviews conducted by RTI. RTI identified potential
interviewees by reviewing lists of participants from the informal
discussions, RFC commenters, and stakeholders participating in the
public meeting. In several instances, stakeholders that were interviewed
approached RTI and asked to be included in the study."
Table 2-4. Informal Discussions, RFC Commenters, and Interviews
Stakeholder Group Informal Discussions RFC Commenters Interviews Infrastructure vendors 7 5 5 Application vendors 0 1 6 ISPs 3 5 6 Infrastructure users 1 1 4 Corporate users 2 0 1 Institutional users 3 0 2 Government users 4 1 3 Research consortiums 3 4 2 Industry and academic experts 1 5 1 Total 24 22 30
Best,
/jim
- application/octet-stream attachment: NAv6TF_IPv6_Transition_Best_Industry_Practices_20060202.pdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 12/01/06 EST