Your IP Address is: 38.103.63.55
[moonv6] More on the discussion of Logo
From: schultz@io.iol.unh.edu
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: CATANZARITI Sergio / FTR&D / US: "[moonv6] FW: [nav6tf] REVIEW RESPONSE: NAv6TF Response V1.1 to NTIA IPv6 R FC"
- Previous message: Dixon, Roswell Maj: "RE: [moonv6] conference call dial-in info"
moonv6 post from schultz@io.iol.unh.edu
Hello,
This is a submission that didn't make it to the list.
Thanks,
-Ben
From: [Patrick Cocquet <patrick.cocquet@6wind.com>]
To: Hiroshi Esaki <hiroshi@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu, members@ipv6forum.com, ipv6ready@ipv6ready.org,
Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> Subject: Re: IPv6 Ready Logo : Call for comments (Phase2 policy)
Hi Hiroshi,
Just a general remark from a company that got the phase one logo.
Multiplying the phases or the steps, means multiplying the costs spent
by companies for the tests and different procedures. So, if the
difference between 2 phases is not so important I don't see a major
interest to spend manpower for a new logo.
Regards,
Patrick
Hiroshi Esaki wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The following is the proposal from IPv6 Ready Logo
> commitee, regarding the Phase 2 logo policy.
>
> We want to ask your comments, before March 8, as well.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hiroshi Esaki, WIDE Project
>
> *******************************************************
> << Phase 2 Logo Policy>>
>
> IPv6 Logo Commitee wants to call any comments suggestion,
> and clarification from anyone, who is interested in
> Phase 2 IPv6 Ready Logo.
>
> 1. As well as Phase 1 program, the applicant submit the
> test result or the reference to be able to refer the
> test result.
> The test result includes both comformance and
> interoperability test. The logo committee does not
> execute the test, but the applicants does execute the
> test.
>
> 2. The logo commitee will define the test specification,
> that will includes multiple functional modules for
> testing. At this time, the logo committee will deliver
> the following four compoments;
> 1) IPv6 Core Protocol Stack
> 2) IPSec
> 3) MIPv6
> 4) Tranistion technologies
> As well as Phase 1, each components have test items
> for each product category.
> The category would be ;
> a. Host
> b. Router
> c. Tunnel Broker
> d. IPv6/IPv4 NAT device
> etc.,
>
> So, the test is the product of {functional_component}
> and {product_category}.
>
> 3. How the logo will be give to the product.
> Basically, when the product satisfy the "IPv6 Core Protocol
> Stack", the product can obtain the right to use the logo.
> On the web, the logo commitee will publish which the
> functional componet(s) and the category, that the applied
> product satisfies.
> Also, the Logo-ID implicates and represents which fucntional
> components, the product satisfies.
>
> (*) Maybe a discussion point;
> IPSec is mandatory option for IPv6.
> However, at this moment of time, when we IPSec is
> mandatory to obtain the Phase 2 logo, it would
> be a so/too hard hurdle for many products.
> However, logo commitee recognizes that IPSec
> is very important and mandatory function, that
> IPv6 node has.
> So, we want to propose the following;
>
> We define two steps;
> 1) Step I : Phase II without mandating IPsec
> (*) Of course, there is a IPSec test
> 2) Step II: Phase II with mandating IPsec
> (*) We mandate the IPSec for logo approval
> # Step II would be from 2006 (?).
>
> *************************************************************
>
> =======================================
>
> Hiroshi ESAKI, Ph.D
> Associate Professor,
> Graduate School of Information Science and Technology,
> The University of Tokyo,
> 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
> Email hiroshi@wide.ad.jp
> TEL : +81-3-5841-7465
> FAX : +81-3-5841-7465
> http://www.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp/
> http://hiroshi1.hongo.wide.ad.jp/hiroshi/index.php
-- Patrick Cocquet 6WIND Chairman / www.6wind.com IPv6 Forum Vice President / www.ipv6forum.com French IPv6 Task Force Chairman / www.fr.ipv6tf.org Tel : +33 1 39 30 92 14 / +33 6 80 94 70 28
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 12/01/06 EST