Your IP Address is: 38.103.63.55
[moonv6] RE: NON-IPv6 Forum Transition Activitiy RE: Your comments on this.. (fwd)
From: Jordan, Jim (Jim.Jordan@spirentfederal.com)
Date: 12/09/05
- Next message: Bound, Jim: "[moonv6] NAv6TF Technology Report - IPv6 Firewall"
- Previous message: Bound, Jim: "[moonv6] Firewall Service as V6 deployment enabler"
moonv6 post from "Jordan, Jim" <Jim.Jordan@spirentfederal.com>
Hi Jim B,
I'm going to be retiring from Spirent at the end of this month. The person on our staff who will be leading Spirent's efforts on IPv6 is Bill Kine, who can be reached at bill.kine@spirentcom.com
It's been good working with you, and if there is any help I can offer as an independent, please feel free to holler.
My new email address after 12-31-05 will be jim.jordan@adelphia.net
Best regards,
Jim J
-----Original Message-----
From: Bound, Jim [mailto:Jim.Bound@hp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 7:28 AM
To: Gopi Garge
Cc: Dattatreya, Hemanth Thalak (STSD); Jaichandra.K;
cto-excom@ipv6forum.com; Latif Ladid ("The New Internet based on IPv6");
ipv6ready-admin@ipv6ready.org; Jordan, Jim; members@ipv6forum.com;
nav6tf@ipv6forum.com; moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu; jdoyle@juniper.net; Latif
Ladid ("The New Internet based on IPv6")
Subject: NON-IPv6 Forum Transition Activitiy RE: Your comments on this..
(fwd)
Gopi,
Also the IPv6 Forum or regional sub-chapters cannot endorse any vendors specific IPv6 Transition Guide or strategy it is not proper or any of our business. But, if any entity makes invalid claims about IPv6 then we will point that out regardless of their identity. This has been our precedent since our existence in 1999.
thanks
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipv6ready-admin@private154.v6pc.jp
> [mailto:owner-ipv6ready-admin@private154.v6pc.jp] On Behalf
> Of Bound, Jim
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:48 AM
> To: Gopi Garge; latif.ladid@village.uunet.lu
> Cc: Dattatreya, Hemanth Thalak (STSD); Jaichandra.K;
> cto-excom@ipv6forum.com; Latif Ladid ("The New Internet based
> on IPv6"); ipv6ready-admin@ipv6ready.org; Jordan, Jim;
> members@ipv6forum.com; nav6tf@ipv6forum.com;
> moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu; jdoyle@juniper.net
> Subject: [ipv6ready-admin:03661] NON-IPv6 Forum Transition
> Activitiy RE: Your comments on this.. (fwd)
>
> Dear Gopi,
>
> I am responding, but copying the IPv6 Forum Members, CTO Exom, and
> NAv6TF/Moonv6 as they are impacted by this paper, and URL below. I
> removed personal questions to me I will answer offline, in
> your mail to
> me not intend for wider distribution. I also copied Jeff
> Doyle and Jim
> Jordan long time supporters of the IPv6 Forum and NAv6TF.
>
> The IPv6 Forum position is that we support and encourage any testing
> centers that are created to support the market for the deployment of
> IPv6. I do find it interesting that IPv6 Forum/NAv6TF/Moonv6 testing
> and IPv6 Forum Logo testing is not mentioned in the paper or at the
> below URL. It seems they were excluded on purpose, which has been the
> marketing strategy of some organizations, and there is
> nothing we can do
> about that or worry about that strategy. Why mention 6NET and not
> Moonv6 in the U.S? Does not make sense to me. The IPv6 Forum will
> continue to support our International regional test centers
> and vendors
> working with us for the greater good. Likewise we will continue to
> advise Governments and Industry on the transition to IPv6 as highly
> respected technology subject matter experts, with much experience and
> credibility.
>
> Moonv6 also will continue to do what it does the only wide
> area network
> native IPv6 peering network across North America working with
> Providers,
> Government, and Industry. Some words that have come back to me and
> stated to me is that Moonv6 is only a U.S. DOD network and that is
> completely a misinterpretation of the wonderful alliance with the U.S.
> Government and NAv6TF/Moonv6 project, and we are working with the
> industry sector too.
>
> In addition if the IPv6 Forum sees invalid technology claims
> about IPv6
> Transition or IPv6 in general in public documents, we will
> correct such
> errors, from within each region. So for example if an entity
> states to
> the Indian Government or Private Enterprise IPv6 neighbor
> discovery does
> not really support stateless Autoconfiguration, then yourself
> and others
> would need to correct such a technical error. Likewise for invalid
> suppositions regarding IPv6 Transition technically.
>
> The bottom line is we must never say anything that is negative or
> defamed about any activity supporting efforts to test,
> market, etc. IPv6
> in Government or Industry. Likewise we will not endorse any activity,
> should we asked, if they do not meet our criteria for our endorsement,
> and that criteria is none of anyone's business but the IPv6 Forum and
> our regional sub-chapters (e.g. India, NAv6TF, China, Japan,
> etc.). So
> I would recommend to you and to all of course entities decide for
> themselves, but we maintain our regional positions about IPv6
> Transition.
>
> Also see below URL, which did not ignore Moonv6 www.moonv6.org
>
> http://www.techworld.com/networking/news/index.cfm?newsid=4964
> &page=1&pa
> gepos=1
>
> /jim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gopi Garge [mailto:gopi@exocore.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:29 AM
> > To: Bound, Jim; latif.ladid@village.uunet.lu
> > Cc: Dattatreya, Hemanth Thalak (STSD); Jaichandra.K
> > Subject: Your comments on this.. (fwd)
> >
> > Dear Jim,
> >
> > The attached doc, an exec summary of a detailed document, was
> > sent to me
> > by the Juniper guys.
> >
>
> > While it isn't possible to curtail any independent industry
> > report such as
> > this one, the lack of an endorsement by the forum for such a
> > report does
> > make a difference. What is the stand I need to take within
> > India on this ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your time,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --Gopi
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Gopi Garge | gopi@exocore.com
> > Exocore Consulting | http://www.exocore.com
> > Bangalore, India | +91(80)5771 4075 Fax +91(80)2341 5187
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 12/01/06 EST